Diagnosis and plan
- Measurement diagnosis of what exists today
- Definition of the indicators that matter for the company’s objectives
- Measurement plan, with a written definition for each indicator
- Organisation of data sources
IntelligenceMarketing intelligence
We organise indicators, interpret results and turn information into priorities, corrections and opportunities.
The diagnosis starts from the decisions that need making, not from the tools in use.
The problem
Most companies that say they have no data have too much of it — scattered across platforms that contradict each other and that nobody reconciles.
A report is not a result. A decision is.
How we think
A dashboard is not the final product. It is an interface for understanding what needs to be done. A beautiful dashboard nobody consults cost the same as a useful one and produced no decisions.
That is why the work starts at the end: which decisions does this company need to take, how often, and who takes them. From there it becomes possible to say which indicators matter — and, more importantly, which can be ignored without loss. Measuring everything is the most elegant way of looking at nothing.
The third point is precision. No marketing measurement is exact: blockers, consent, multiple devices and attribution windows guarantee that platforms will always disagree. The objective is not the perfect number, it is a reading consistent enough to compare periods and decide.
What it is
Marketing intelligence is the work of defining what to measure, organising the sources, interpreting what the numbers show, and converting that into a recommended action — a correction, a reallocation or a bet.
The technical part — events, conversions, dashboards, reconciled sources — is a condition, not the deliverable. It exists so that the reading is possible. What the company is buying is the reading.
That includes saying what cannot be claimed. A good analysis separates what the data supports, what it merely suggests and what remains a hypothesis — instead of giving everything the same degree of certainty in order to sound conclusive.
Scope
The composition depends on what is already measured, the tools in use and the decisions at stake.
Where the need involves software, custom connectors or engineering, it is assessed together with Centriu. We do not promise that within the Arte com Pimenta offering without that validation.
Not every project uses every indicator. Demanding CAC, LTV and margin from an operation that does not yet record sale origin would create work before creating usefulness.
Vocabulary
Before comparing numbers, it is necessary to agree on what each one means. This is the definition we use.
We publish no benchmark figures for any of these. They vary with sector, ticket size, cycle, region and maturity — and an average quoted out of context leads to a wrong decision that looks well-founded.
Process
From the decision that has to be taken to the routine that sustains it.
Mapping the decisions the company needs to take, and what is measured today, with which tool and at what level of reliability.
A written definition for each indicator, the sources, the attribution windows and the success criteria.
Events, conversions, source organisation and dashboards built inside the tools in use.
Periodic analysis separating what the data supports from what it merely suggests, with a prioritised recommendation.
A follow-up session with the people who decide, where each recommendation becomes a recorded decision — or is dismissed with a reason.
When it fits
Intelligence addresses uncertainty in decisions, not a shortage of demand.
Limits
Measuring well shows the problem clearly. It does not fix it.
The analysis says where the problem is. Fixing it is usually the work of another area — media, website, content or the sales process.
How we do not work
Common practices in the data market that we do not adopt.
Where a visual example appears on this page or in a proposal, it is a conceptual structure with no data — never a client result presented as a benchmark.
Questions
Because each uses its own attribution window, its own conversion criteria and its own ability to identify the person. Adding up different dashboards produces a number that does not exist. The work is to define one reference and use the others as diagnosis.
In most cases, no. We work inside what the company already uses. Where something essential is missing, we point to what fits the scope — but the choice and the contract are the company’s, and we do not resell platforms.
We do, when one serves a recurring decision. But the dashboard is a means, not an end: what defines the deliverable is the periodic reading and the recommendation. A dashboard with no reading routine stops being opened within weeks.
That is the most common situation, and it is where the work begins. Implementing well-defined basic measurement usually pays back more in the first cycle than any sophisticated analysis of data that does not exist.
Where the need involves custom connectors, data engineering or development, it is assessed together with Centriu. Arte com Pimenta does not develop software, and does not take on that scope without that validation.
You can, and sometimes it is the right choice — particularly when other agencies or an internal team already execute and what is missing is an independent reading. What has to exist is access to the data and someone with the authority to act on the recommendation.
The measurement diagnosis starts from the decisions at stake, assesses what is already measured, and points out what has to exist for the reading to be reliable.
No proposal is sent before the diagnosis conversation.