Project types
- Institutional websites
- Commercial websites
- Landing pages
- Microsites
- Campaign pages
- Capture pages
ConversionWebsites and landing pages
We bring together strategy, content, experience, design, SEO and conversion to build pages that communicate value and lead the visitor to the next step.
The assessment looks at the current site before proposing a rebuild — the problem is often smaller than it seems.
The problem
Most sites that do not convert are not ugly. They are undecided: everything is presented with the same weight, and the whole choice is left to whoever arrived.
A site that presents the company without helping the decision hands the visitor a job that belonged to the page.
How we think
A site converts when someone arriving understands, within a few seconds, what the company solves, for whom, and what the next step is. Everything else — identity, animation, depth of content — only works once those three answers are clear.
That makes hierarchy more decisive than aesthetics. Deciding what appears first, what comes after and what does not need to be on the page at all is a business decision, not a layout one. This is why the project starts with content and architecture, not with visual references.
It also changes what counts as finished. A site published without measurement is in production, not in operation: without knowing where people give up, any later change is guesswork.
What it is
In this area, websites and landing pages are pages built to communicate value clearly, remove doubt and lead the visitor to a defined action — with a technical structure that lets them be found and measured.
An institutional site and a landing page solve different problems. The site sustains a company’s permanent presence, has to be findable in search, and answers varied audiences. A landing page exists for a campaign, has a single objective, and is judged by a rate.
The choice between them — or both — comes from the diagnosis. Building an entire site when the bottleneck was a campaign page is expensive; using a landing page to carry a company’s permanent presence is fragile.
Scope
The composition depends on what exists today, the objective and the timeline.
Systems, software and proprietary technology projects are assessed by Centriu. Arte com Pimenta does not develop software — saying otherwise to avoid losing a project is the kind of promise that costs dearly later.
Not every project uses every item. Often the recommendation is to adjust the existing site rather than rebuild it.
Process
From objective to launch, with content defined before the design.
Assessment of the current site, the traffic it receives, what measurement already shows, and where the loss happens.
What action the page has to prompt, from whom, and by which route that person arrives.
Information structure, hierarchy, copy and wireframe — the decisions that define the project before any aesthetics.
Responsive design, development, integration with the tools in use, technical SEO and measurement implementation.
Device checks, review of forms and events, publication and follow-up through the first weeks.
When it fits
Websites and landing pages address lost conversion, not missing traffic.
Limits
A good page improves the conversion of what arrives. It does not make anyone arrive.
This is why a website usually comes alongside paid media or SEO: one solves the arrival, the other solves what happens after it.
Indicators
Measurement goes in with the page, not after it.
We publish no benchmark conversion rate. It varies with traffic source, ticket size, decision cycle and type of action — comparing against a market average leads to wrong decisions.
Questions
No. Arte com Pimenta works with websites, landing pages and campaign pages as marketing assets. Systems, software and proprietary technology projects are assessed by Centriu, the group structure dedicated to that.
Often not. The assessment usually finds problems concentrated in a few pages or in the content structure, and adjusting is cheaper and faster than rebuilding. Recommending a rebuild without that assessment would be selling by the largest scope.
It depends on the number of pages, whether content exists and the pace of approvals. What delays website projects most is not development: it is pending content and open decisions. The schedule is estimated once scope is closed.
We write it, with research alongside the company. We need access to people who know the operation: without that, the text stays at the level any competitor could also claim.
The choice comes from the project: it depends on who will maintain the site, which integrations are needed and what the company already uses. We do not impose a single platform and we do not resell licences.
Either the company or us, when maintenance is contracted. What gets settled before launch is who does what — a site with no maintenance owner ages quickly and becomes a problem again.
With tools that offer ready integrations, yes — that is part of the scope. What we do not do is build custom connectors or bespoke automation: when that is the need, the project is assessed by Centriu.
The website assessment examines structure, content, speed, measurement and the path the visitor takes — and points out what pays off first.
No proposal is sent before the diagnosis conversation.